Mudjacking and foam jacking are two different methods of lifting concrete slabs. Mudjacking uses a pump to inject a slurry of mud and water beneath the slab, while foam jacking uses a pump to inject polyurethane foam. Both methods can be used to lift sunken concrete slabs back to their original position.
Mudjacking is a process of injecting a slurry mixture beneath a concrete slab in order to raise and level it. The mixture consists of water, clay, sand, and cement, which expands as it hardens to fill any voids underneath the slab. This process can be used to level both interior and exterior surfaces, and can be performed on driveways, sidewalks, patios, pool decks, and more. Mudjacking is an effective and affordable alternative to replacing concrete surfaces, and can extend the life of your existing concrete by many years.
However, when it comes to concrete lifting, there are a few different ways to go about it. One popular method today is using foam. Foam concrete lifting is a type of mudjacking. The main difference with foam concrete lifting is that instead of using mud or slurry, lightweight foam is used. The process much less invasive and can be done in a shorter amount of time than traditional mudjacking.
The first step in foam concrete lifting is to drill small holes in the slab. These holes will be used to inject the foam beneath the slab. Once the holes have been drilled, the foam is injected into them. The foam will then expand, lifting the slab back into place. Once the slab is lifted, the holes are filled in and the foam will harden, creating a strong support for the slab.
The use of foam concrete lifting as an alternative to the more conventional method of mudjacking is advantageous due to the fact that it is less intrusive, can be completed in a shorter period of time, and is more cost-effective. If you have a sunken concrete slab, contact a professional to see if foam concrete lifting is right for you.
Mudjacking and foam jacking are two effective methods for lifting sunken concrete slabs. When choosing between the two, it is important to consider the cost, precision, and potential for damage.